Records / Negotiation levers

No collecting society has published how it will split AI income between authors and publishers; the nearest published collective split is 17.5 percent to authors from UK newspaper licensing

Finland's Kopiosto says the fees it collects go to authors and publishers through its member organisations, which pass them on, among other ways, as grants and prizes, and that the member organisations decide the content and conditions of any AI licence. Copyright Agency says only that fair payment to members is a key principle and that more detail will follow. The UK's PLS says the training scheme was built with CLA and ALCS, keeps the scheme's FAQ and licence terms in its publisher-only section, and states no split on its public pages. The nearest published collective split is for newspaper licensing: PLS pays 17.5 percent to authors (through ALCS) and 10 percent to visual artists before the rest goes to publishers, under its Rights Valuation effective 1 January 2016. That is a figure for NLA media access, the UK newspaper licence, not an AI figure.

Dated 31 Oct 2026Source checked 31 Oct 2026Quote found on its page again 1 Nov 2026Basis: indicative

In the source's own words
“jotka jakavat ne edelleen tekijöille ja kustantajille muun muassa erilaisina apurahoina ja palkintoina.”
Also read from the same source
Figures it counts in

It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.

No collecting society has published how it will split AI income between authors and… | AIData.Broker