Records / Negotiation levers

The only prices collecting societies publish for AI are per-employee add-ons for prompting; none publishes a training price per title, so a catalogue is priced by negotiation

ProLitteris (Switzerland) sets the charge for internal AI systems at the same amount per full-time equivalent and year as its copying tariff GT 8 and states no amount on the page. Kopiosto (Finland) raised its copying licence price in all industries over two years from 1 January 2026 because the licence now covers copying a work into an AI prompt, priced per employee by industry. Training is not tariffed: Kopiosto's add-on for fine-tuning a company's internal AI says to ask for the price, Copyright Agency (Australia) says its licensing models are still being developed, and the UK scheme for training, fine-tuning and retrieval opened to publishers in March 2026 on an opt-in basis with no published fee. The one training fee found is Norway's lump sum.

Dated 31 Oct 2026Source checked 31 Oct 2026Quote found on its page again 1 Nov 2026Basis: indicative

In the source's own words
“ProLitteris orientiert sich die Vergütung an GT 8 und beträgt den gleichen Betrag pro Vollzeitäquivalent und Jahr wie der”
Figures it counts in

It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.

The only prices collecting societies publish for AI are per-employee add-ons for… | AIData.Broker