hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, stipulated consent judgment (filed 6 December 2022): deletion of scraped data (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 405 (proposed consent judgment and permanent injunction))
The scraper had to delete the scraped profiles and the code built to use them. Scraped data can be ordered destroyed, which is a reason buyers avoid it.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“The Prohibited Parties are required to permanently delete any and all LinkedIn member profile data in the possession, custody, or control of the Prohibited Parties, including all such material that any Prohibited Party stored on behalf of hiQ in an account with a third-party, including without limitation the materials identified in Exhibit A hereto;”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, stipulated consent judgment and permanent injunction (filed 6 December 2022) (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 405)
- hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, stipulated consent judgment (filed 6 December 2022): the amount (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 405 (proposed consent judgment and permanent injunction))
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide