hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, stipulated consent judgment and permanent injunction (filed 6 December 2022) (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 405)
The scraper that won on the anti-hacking law lost on contract. The parties' stipulated judgment also required hiQ to delete the scraped data and the code and models built from it.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“WHEREAS, the Court concluded in its summary judgment order that LinkedIn’s User Agreement unambiguously and enforceably prohibits unauthorized scraping and creation of fake accounts;”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, stipulated consent judgment (filed 6 December 2022): the amount (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 405 (proposed consent judgment and permanent injunction))
- hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn, stipulated consent judgment (filed 6 December 2022): deletion of scraped data (hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 405 (proposed consent judgment and permanent injunction))
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide