Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): only non-generative AI (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
The trial judge limited his ruling to a tool that returns existing text, leaving generative training to other courts.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“Because the AI landscape is changing rapidly, I note for readers that only non-generative AI is before me today.”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: fair use rejected on summary judgment
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): market for AI training data (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): the refused licence (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide