Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): market for AI training data (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
The trial judge held that harm to a potential market for AI training data is enough under factor four, even if the holder had not yet licensed its data to anyone.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“And it does not matter whether Thomson Reuters has used the data to train its own legal search tools; the effect on a potential market for AI training data is enough.”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: fair use rejected on summary judgment
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): the refused licence (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): only non-generative AI (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide