Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, order on cross-motions for partial summary judgment (25 June 2025): the licensing market argument (Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-03417-VC (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2025), Dkt. 598, at 27)
Judge Chhabria, like Judge Alsup, refused to count lost fees for licensing works as training data as factor-four harm, to keep the analysis from becoming circular.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“But whether such a market exists or is likely to develop is irrelevant, because this market is not one that the plaintiffs are legally entitled to monopolize.”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- Kadrey v. Meta: summary judgment for Meta on fair use
- Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, order on cross-motions for partial summary judgment (25 June 2025): market dilution (Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-03417-VC (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2025), Dkt. 598, at 28)
- Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, order on cross-motions for partial summary judgment (25 June 2025): the limits of the ruling (Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-03417-VC (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2025), Dkt. 598, at 4 to 5)
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide