X.AI LLC v. Bonta (C.D. Cal. 2026): the topics AB 2013 requires, as the court quotes them (X.AI LLC v. Bonta, No. 2:25-cv-12295-JGB-SSC (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2026), Dkt. 35, pp. 1-2)
AB 2013's twelve topics read like a provenance record: sources or owners, whether data was purchased or licensed, personal information, processing and collection period. A developer can only answer them if its suppliers documented the same.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“(5) Whether the datasets include any data protected by copyright, trademark, or patent, or whether the datasets are entirely in the public domain. (6) Whether the datasets were purchased or licensed by the developer. (7) Whether the datasets include personal information . . . . (8) Whether the datasets include aggregate consumer information . . . . (9) Whether there was any cleaning, processing, or other modification to the datasets by the developer, including the intended purpose of those efforts in relation to the artificial intelligence system or service. (10) The time period during which the data in the datasets were collected, including a notice if the data collection is ongoing.”
Where it was read
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide