In re Spirit Aviation Holdings: Consumer Privacy Ombudsman supplemental report (de-identification standard) (In re Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc., No. 25-11897-SHL (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. 1684, p. 6 (5 October 2026))
Although no state law forced it, the estate and Google adopted California's three-part de-identification standard for the whole sale, which made it the working benchmark for a court-approved records sale.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“the Debtors and the successful bidder have voluntarily agreed to follow the deidentification standard adopted in the California Consumer Privacy Act”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- The Spirit enterprise data on sale to Google derives from about 190 million flights and touches the personal data of about 97 million passengers; after the 5 October 2026 narrowing the structured passenger systems are out and corporate email stays in, de-identified by Tonic.ai.
- Settle the employee-data question before going to market
- Certified de-identification is the closing condition, so payment waits for it
- Drop consumer transaction systems to clear privacy review; the price held
- In a privacy-sensitive sale, structure beats a higher late price
- In re Spirit Aviation Holdings: Consumer Privacy Ombudsman supplemental report on the sale of deidentified data (conclusion) (In re Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc., No. 25-11897-SHL (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. 1684 (5 October 2026))
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in these 2 guides