In re 23andMe Holding Co.: buyer keeps the privacy policy, deletion rights and customer notice (June 27, 2025) (In re 23andMe Holding Co., et al., No. 25-40976-357 (Bankr. E.D. Mo.), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 908 (June 27, 2025))
What made the sale approvable: the buyer adopted the seller's policy unchanged, kept deletion and research opt-out rights, and customers were told by email before closing so they could delete.
Dated 17 Oct 2026Source checked 17 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“Following the closing, TTAM’s privacy policy will be the same as the Debtors’ policy in effect on the petition date (Wojcicki Decl. ¶ 14). This includes customers’ continuing deletion rights and the ability to opt out of research in perpetuity (Id.). ... The Debtors and TTAM have agreed to send another notice by email to current customers, at least two days prior to closing, informing them about TTAM’s privacy practices, customers’ right to delete their accounts and data, and related matters.”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- In re 23andMe Holding Co.: memorandum opinion approving the sale to TTAM Research Institute (June 27, 2025) (In re 23andMe Holding Co., et al., No. 25-40976-357 (Bankr. E.D. Mo.), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 908 (June 27, 2025))
- In re 23andMe Holding Co.: section 363(b)(1) does not let a debtor ignore state data-transfer laws (June 27, 2025) (In re 23andMe Holding Co., et al., No. 25-40976-357 (Bankr. E.D. Mo.), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 908 (June 27, 2025))
- In re 23andMe Holding Co.: which privacy policy counts under section 363(b)(1) (June 27, 2025) (In re 23andMe Holding Co., et al., No. 25-40976-357 (Bankr. E.D. Mo.), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 908 (June 27, 2025))
- In re 23andMe Holding Co.: court declines the ombudsman's opt-in consent condition (June 27, 2025) (In re 23andMe Holding Co., et al., No. 25-40976-357 (Bankr. E.D. Mo.), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 908 (June 27, 2025))
- In re 23andMe Holding Co.: memorandum opinion approving the sale (objecting states) (In re 23andMe Holding Co., et al., No. 25-40976-357 (Bankr. E.D. Mo.), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 908 (June 27, 2025))
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide