Updated 8 Nov 2026

micro1 vs Turing, by the numbers.

By revenue, micro1 is the larger: $1B (run rate, Oct 2026), against Turing's $300M (run rate, Mar 2025). Turing's figure is the older by 19 months; no later one is on record.

Both sell RL environments, evaluations and benchmarks, expert and human data and datasets. Every figure below is linked to the filing or article it comes from; what each sells is in its own words, from its own pages.

Hold data companies like these buy? AIData.Broker values it free and introduces it to every buyer that takes it, at no cost to you: the buyers pay us. Where it earns more, we run the sale ourselves, for a fee only out of a sale.

  • No data upload
  • About two minutes
  • No email needed

Side by side

Revenue over twelve months, the newest valuation, disclosed funding and what each says it does.

micro1 and Turing compared on revenue, valuation, funding and what each sells
micro1Turing
micro1Turing
Place on the rankings#4 of 78#9 of 78
Ranked on$1B Revenue, run rate, Oct 2026$300M Revenue, run rate, Mar 2025
Revenue, twelve months$1B run rate, Oct 2026 over time$300M run rate, Mar 2025 over time
Newest valuation$4B Oct 2026$2.2B Mar 2025
Disclosed funding$138M in 4 records$111M in 1 record
SellsRL environments, Evaluations and benchmarks, Expert and human data, DatasetsRL environments, Datasets, Expert and human data, Evaluations and benchmarks
Works onCoding, Finance, Legal, Medical, Speech and audioCoding, Computer use, Business work, Finance, Legal, Medical, Science, Images and video
Made fromMade by experts and contractorsMade by experts and contractors, Replicas of real software
Takes data from companiesThrough our introductionsThrough our introductions
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, USSan Francisco, United States
Founded20222018
In its own words“We're building the infrastructure for advancing intelligence through expert human data, real-world training environments, and contextual evaluations” Its page“We offer frontier AI labs custom and off-the-shelf datasets, RL environments, and human experts in software engineering, enterprise knowledge work, and frontier STEM.” Its page
The rule.
Each company is ranked on the first of these it has on record: its revenue over twelve months (a run rate or a year as published, or its last four quarters added up; an AI segment where the rest of its business is not AI data), then its newest valuation, then the money it disclosed raising. No company pays for a place. The full method and every change to it.
Twelve months.
A run rate or ARR is the company's own annualised figure; a year is the year it published. Gross revenue of a human data company includes what it pays its experts.
Pays companies for data.
"Through our introductions": it takes companies' data through AIData.Broker's introductions and pays us a referral fee when one goes ahead. That never moves its place: the order is the money on record. "Its own programme": a published programme for buying data. "Says it buys data": its own words, linked.
Why this pair.
People search for this comparison: Google suggests it, read on 8 Nov 2026. Neither company asked for or paid for this page.

Selling your company's data to micro1 or Turing

What each says it pays a company for its data, what it wants and when it pays, in its own published terms.

What micro1 and Turing publish about buying a company's data
micro1Turing
Takes data from companiesThrough our introductionsThrough our introductions
What it says it pays$100K to $3M micro1, data partnerships page, 5 Nov 2026Not published
What it wantsInternal communications, SOPs, project histories, CRM records, support tickets and other business documentation; separately, the trajectories a company's own AI agents produce.Team communication, source code with reviews and tickets, wikis, runbooks, schemas and the reasoning behind decisions.
When it paysUp to about 60 days from the transfer: its FAQ gives micro1 "30 days to review and approve" the data, then pays "within 30 days of invoicing"; its payment step says "We pay in full within 30 days of acceptance" (its data partnerships page, 29 Oct 2026).A share of each sale, as each licence to a lab is sold; nothing if nothing sells. Turing alone sells the record for the first 90 days, then the company can renew or opt out.

You need not choose one: AIData.Broker values a company's data free and introduces it to every buyer whose own rules take it. Value your data

On the same rankings

The lists both are ranked on, with each one's place.

The latest money moves

The newest rounds, valuations and revenue figures of the two, each linked to its record.

The questions people ask

Is micro1 bigger than Turing?
By revenue, micro1 is the larger: $1B (run rate, Oct 2026), against Turing's $300M (run rate, Mar 2025). Turing's figure is the older by 19 months; no later one is on record.
What is the difference between micro1 and Turing?
micro1 provides expert human data, RL environments, and evaluations to AI labs and frontier robotics labs. Turing sells off-the-shelf and custom datasets, RL environments, and human experts to frontier AI labs in software engineering, enterprise knowledge work, and STEM. Both sell RL environments, evaluations and benchmarks, expert and human data and datasets.
Which raised more money, micro1 or Turing?
micro1: $138M disclosed, valued at $4B (2026). Turing: $111M disclosed, valued at $2.2B (2025).
Do micro1 and Turing buy data from companies?
micro1 takes data from the companies that hold it, through a published programme. Turing takes data from the companies that hold it, through a published programme.

These companies buy and build the data AI is trained on. See what yours is worth to them.